OhioLINK History of Philosophy Website
1:10-2:00 MWF
313 Bowman Hall
Spring 1996
Professor Jeffrey Wattles
320-H Bowman Hall
2:10-4:40
and by appointment.
We will explore and compare and contrast Hegel, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche on how they articulate philosophy in relation to science, religion, and art. This intensive writing course involves three main writing assignments, each supported by other written exercises, plus class participation.
Required texts:
Evaluation will be based on (1) regular, well-prepared class participation, including attendance--more than three absences may affect your grade--10%; and (2) on the written work required for each module--30% each. You will be given a grade for each module as a whole. All written assignments will be evaluated in part for the quality of writing at the level of the sentence, paragraph, and essay as a whole as well as for specific philosophic virtues--accuracy of interpretation, clarity of exposition, etc.; rewrites will be required, as needed. The instructor is happy to offer tutoring in writing (having taught college English for 6 years) to assist the student in achieving the goals of the course. If you have a handicap of which the instructor should be aware, please communicate that during your first week.
The Philosophy Department Grievance Procedure for handling student grievances is in conformity with the Student Academic Complaint Policy and Procedures set down as University Policy 3342-4-16 in the University Policy Register. For information concerning the details of the grievance procedure, please see the Departmental Chairperson.
| Date | Assignment | |
|---|---|---|
| January | 17 |
Introduction to the course and to Hegel. The
sequence of selections from Hegel violates historic and systematic
considerations; it is motivated by the desire to begin with what is more
accessible. As you read, mark or note the passages that are particularly
clear and meaningful to you, and prepare to share your findings with a
comment. |
| 19 | Philosophy of art: 371-392 | |
| 22 | Philosophy of art: 392-420 (You may want also to look at 421-425) | |
| 24 | Philosophy of history: 331-335 (notice how Hegel portrays philosophy's
role in articulating the content of an empirical science). | |
| 26 | Philosophy of history: 353-370. Mini-exercise: write one page on what
relations Hegel seems to portray (in the selection on history) between his
philosophic concept of Geist (mind, spirit, culture) and the religious
concept of God. | |
| 29 | Ethics: 288-306 | |
| 31 | Ethics: 306-330 | |
| February | 2 | Positivity of the Christian Religion 71-85;
cf. 102, paragraphs 2-3; 198-201; 231-32; and 425-36.
Turn in a mini-exercise (2 pages): what concept of the
relation between philosophy and religion do you find in these texts? |
| 5 | Phenomenology, Introduction: 152-160 | |
| 7 | Consciousness: 161-167 | |
| 9 | Self-Consciousness: 168-180 | |
| 12 | Preface: 114-134 (see note) | |
| 14 | Preface: 134-143 | |
| 16 | Preface: 143-151 | |
| 19 | Logic: 181-201 | |
| 21 | Logic: 235-260 | |
| 23 | Macro-exercise, 5 pages: How Hegel's concept of Geist is
presented as transcending the religious concept of God. | |
| 26 | Kierkegaard proposed that there are three stages on
life's way--the aesthetic, the ethical, and the religious. These selections
will be roughly organized to illustrate his expositions of these categories.
Read 1-36, emphasizing 14-18 and--for a sketch of aesthetic living,
Either/Or 21-36. | |
| 28 | The aesthetic, continued: Either/Or 72-80. See also 108; 174,
last paragraph; 325; 469.3; and xxvi ("What is a poet?). How does the
aesthetic engagement in the arts differ from the religious? On the
beauties of nature see 3; 13; 35; 45; 62-63; 72; and 83. | |
| March | 1 | An exposition of the ethical perspective from within: 80-108 (cf. 9, par.2;
58, par.3; 186-88) |
| 4 | Critique of culture: The Present Age 260-269; 330-33; The
Attack upon Christendom 434-439 | |
| 6 | Kierkegaard's subordination of the ethical to the religious: Fear and
Trembling 116-134 | |
| 8 | Religious duty: Works of Love 281-306 (cf. p. 9; 455, paragraph
2; 469). Miniexercise (2 pages): Kierkegaard's religious ethics as seen in the
chapter, "Thou shalt love." | |
| 11 | The religious: 372-413 | |
| 13 | The religious: Two Edifying Discourses 108-116; cf. 470-82 | |
| 15 | The religious: Training in Christianity 372-413 | |
| 18 | Philosophical Fragments 153-172 | |
| 20 | Concluding Unscientific Postscript, 190-207.
Mini-exercise: Kierkegaard's critique of Hegel (2 pages) | |
| 22 | Concluding Unscientific Postscript, 207-231; QUIZ | |
| April | 1 | Concluding Unscientific Postscript, 207-231 |
| 3 | Concluding Unscientific Postscript, 231-258 | |
| 5 | Second macro-exercise due, five pages: to be
determined. | |
| 8 | Nietzsche, The Gay Science 31-38; (skim 39-69)
(exercises to be set later) | |
| 10 | Book One 73-98 | |
| 12 | Book One 98-118 | |
| 15 | Book Two 121-144 | |
| 17 | Book Two 145-164 | |
| 19 | Book Three 167-196 | |
| 22 | Book Three 197-220 | |
| 24 | Book Four 221-250 | |
| 26 | Book Four 251-275 | |
| 29 | Book Five 277-304 | |
| May | 1 | Book Five 304-331 |
| 3 | Book Five 331-348 | |
| 9 | Instead of a final examination, please submit your
3rd Macro-exercise by 12:30 Thursday, May 9. If you would like
notification of your grade, leave a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
instructor. | |
Note If it seems necessary to get a solid grounding in the more accessible portions of our anthology rather than to read the full schedule of assignments, the Preface to the Phenomenology and the readings from the Science of Logic will be optional. (Return to Course Schedule.)
This page is part of the OhioLINK History of Philosophy Instructional Website designed and developed by the Department of Philosophy at Kent State University. We are interested in any comments you may have concerning this syllabus. Send e-mail to the KSU Department of Philosophy Instructional Website Team or directly to Professor Jeffrey Wattles, who designed this syllabus.
[ Return to the Spring 1996 (this class) Homepage ]
[ Return to the Nineteenth-Century Philosophy Homepage ]