OhioLINK History of Philosophy Website
Professor Gayle Ormiston
4. At the bottom of the Micro 5 Reporting Sheet, write a 2-4 line conjecture on this question:
What exactly are the "features" or "devices" of the statements recorded on the reporting sheet that lead you to identify and report a statement (or statements) by Whewell, Mill, and Peirce as a DEFINITION? In other words, what constitutes a definition in these writers texts?
Micro 5 Reporting Sheet: Please record your findings in the following table.
A. Definitions
| DEFINITION | Whewell | Mill | Peirce |
| i. inference * |
* | * | * |
| ii. deduction * |
* | * | * |
| iii. induction * |
* | * | * |
| iv. hypothesis * |
* | * | * |
B. 2-4 Line Conjecture on the character of a definition in Whewell, Mill, and Peirce:
Micro 5 Report
1. Round-robin reading of 2-4 line conjectures on 'definition' in Whewell, Mill, and Peirce.
2. Round-robin reading of ONE definition from each of Whewell, Mill, and Peirce for each of the four terms:
a. Among the four terms in 2 above, on what term(s) do you find the greatest resemblance between Whewell, Mill, and Peirce? What are some indications of these similarities?
b. Among the four terms in 2 above, on what term(s) do you find the greatest differences between Whewell, Mill, and Peirce? What are some indications of these differences?
This page is part of the OhioLINK History of Philosophy Instructional Website designed and developed by the Department of Philosophy at Kent State University. We are interested in any comments you may have concerning this Micro Writing Exercise. Send e-mail to the KSU Department of Philosophy Instructional Website Development Team or directly to Professor Gayle Ormiston, who designed this exercise.
[ Return to the Spring 1995 (this class) Homepage ]
[ Return to the Nineteenth-Century Philosophy Homepage ]
[
Return to the OhioLINK History of Philosophy Homepage ]
Spring 1995.
KSU Department of Philosophy